Jump to content

EXHAUST SYSTEM ASCONA/MANTA 2.0 CARB ENGINE


Philip skinner
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, ®evo03 said:

Agree, should move with the historic date, 40yrs plus, wouldn't that make sense? 

Wonder could a black plastic plate with silver gel text be used? Pushing the 🚢

I am sure I have seen those or something very similar

edit: quick search finds this, scroll down to acrylic option

https://www.classicplatesonline.co.uk/plates.asp?refresh=1&c=1

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hardest plates i have found to get nowadays are the normal yellow white type up to 2001 ish where the digits are rounded . no one seems to be able to make those type ???

and i must be one of the unusual type who actually think plates look good . but then i do think all cars look bare without mudflaps too ! ( and poper pull up aerials !)

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Pullup aerials!? don't you mean automatic pop up aerials? Pull-ups are for the plebs!

It's nice they haven't abolished the Historic Vehicle class as my sister is patiently waiting for her 1989 MK4 escort to gain Historic Status... If it makes it that far without going SORN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i must be a pleb then ! lol

i definately prefer the manual pull up types as they dont often fail whereas the electric ones do ( plus manual was std for the time !)

just prefer things that make the car look like it belongs in the era it came from l hence why i like  mudflaps, rostyles,vinyl roofs etc.and definately no led bulbs !   i also think wing mirrors look cool ( although pretty useless as an actual  mirror per se ) shame our cars never had them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All unnessassary add on, Ariel, fog light, no wing mounted mirrors thanks, towbars unless removable, take away from the cars design, and are just bulky add ons, as if they where missing of the design brief. 

Wind deflectors yes, as who can live without them. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is why we all have our own opinions i suppose. nobody is right and nobody is wrong. and obviously nobody intends to offend anyone else either. 

i see where you are coming from regards more minimalist in appearance but im the total opposite. i think that cars look bare without any extras  . but i mean std extras ( or period correct). take a standard 4 door mk1 cavalier L for example vs a gls saloon. with the extra chrome,wheels,vinyl top ,arches,sill covers. or a basic victor vs a 2300 gls for example. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...